For property managers
Claude, implemented and managed for your property management company.
Leasing, maintenance, and accounting staff are already using AI on applications, leases, and tenant messages. Tenant information and fair-housing rules apply to every one of those uses.
Already happening
What your staff are doing today.
Not to assign blame. The assessment starts by finding it, tool by tool, so the ungoverned path can be replaced with a governed one.
- —Screening summaries and applicant replies drafted with a chatbot
- —Lease renewals, notices, and owner reports written from tenant records
- —Maintenance triage and vendor coordination with unit and tenant details in the prompt
What already binds you
The rules did not change when the tools did.
Every finding in the report is tied to the duty or standard it falls under, so the fix is defensible to whoever asks.
- —Fair-housing rules, for anything that screens, ranks, or answers applicants
- —Tenant privacy — applications, income documents, and payment histories
- —Owner agreements and trust-account rules for the money you hold
The assessment
Two weeks. Fixed fee. You keep the report.
Two weeks inside your property manager. We find where AI is already in use, which client information it touches, and under what policy — interviews with the people doing the work, a review of the tools they actually use, and a walk through the policies you already have.
A baseline Company Skoor — your score against the published rubric — and a written finding for every gap, tied to the duty or standard it falls under, with a remediation plan priced for phase two. Yours to keep whether or not you continue.
A fixed fee, quoted on your size before you commit and fixed once quoted. If you go on to implementation, the full fee is credited against it.
If you continue: Claude on your own devices, a written profile per role, connectors allowlisted, the audit trail wired to a store you control, staff trained. Then annual maintenance, with every agent scored continuously.
Rubric v1.0 is scoped to CPA firms. A rubric for property managers is published here before the first engagement, and the standards it tracks are named in the report. The rubric →
What a deployment looks like
A written profile per role.
Permissions scoped to what that role may touch, connectors allowlisted, review where the work goes out under your name. Examples, not a menu — yours are written from the findings.
- —Leasing — applicant communication with no screening decisions made by the tool
- —Maintenance — triage and vendor dispatch, tenant data scoped to the work order
- —Accounting — owner reporting and reconciliation with the audit trail retained
Why the number is worth something
Start with the assessment.
Two weeks. A fixed fee, quoted on your size and credited in full against implementation. A baseline Company Skoor and a written finding for every gap — yours to keep either way.
Also for construction companies · law firms · accounting firms
Claude is a product of Anthropic, PBC. Skoor is an independent implementer and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic. A Skoor scores controls; it is not a legal opinion.