Community
The community is the published work.
There is no forum here, and no member count. What there is: a registry anyone can check, a set of refusals we are held to, and a record of what we got wrong. Those are the things worth gathering around, and they are the things we can actually stand behind.
The connector registry
Every connector in the Claude ecosystem, with what each one does — and, where we have published a scope, what a governed agent could never do with it, who holds the credential, and what lands in your audit trail.
What we refuse to do
Never move money. Never hold your credentials. Never retain your data. Never push a profile change silently. Published in full, because a list that never says no tells you nothing about the ones it says yes to.
The watch
Regulation, incidents, and what they mean for agents — court rulings on agent accountability, disclosed vulnerability classes, and what changes when a standard moves. Written for the person who has to answer for it.
The cookbook
Recipes — the deployable patterns we certify, and what each one is scoped against. A recipe is versioned; customisation becomes a new entry rather than a private fork.
Taking part
Three ways in, all of which change what gets published next.
Request a connector
Tell us which system and which obligation, and we will scope it. Requests shape what gets a governance scope next.
Request one→Correct an entry
If a scope, a refusal, or an audit field is wrong on any listing, tell us. A registry is only worth reading if being wrong in public is expensive for us.
Send a correction→Get assessed
Two weeks, fixed fee, and you keep the report either way. It is also how a connector gets a real scope instead of a proposed one.
Book an assessment→What is not here yet
No forum, no events, no academy, no member directory. Those need either a lot of customers who want to talk to each other, or a standing commitment to moderation. We have neither yet, and a quiet forum is a worse signal than an honest empty space.
When there is a room worth convening, it will be Skoorkeepers — the people who have to answer for what their firm’s agents did — comparing notes on what an examiner actually asked. Until then, the registry and the refusals are the useful thing, and they do not require anyone to show up.