SKOOR

Compare

SKOOR vs Manual Review

See how automated entity scoring compares to traditional manual review across every dimension that matters.

1,800x

Faster per entity

99.9%

Cost reduction

99.997%

Scoring accuracy

Metric

SKOOR

Manual Review

Time per entity
< 200ms
2-4 hours
Cost per assessment
$0.005
$45-120
Accuracy
99.997%
~85%
Consistency
Deterministic
Varies by analyst
Monitoring frequency
Every 5 minutes
Quarterly
Scale
Unlimited
~50/day per analyst
Factors analyzed
7 standardized
Ad hoc
Audit trail
Full (timestamped)
Partial (notes)
Score verifiability
JWT-signed proofs
Not verifiable
Batch processing
1,000/request
Sequential
Cross-chain coverage
39 chains
1-2 chains
Alert automation
Webhooks + email
Manual follow-up
Regulatory readiness
JWKS + JWT proofs
PDF reports
Setup time
2 minutes
Weeks

Why the gap exists

Automated scoring eliminates human bottlenecks

SKOOR processes entities in milliseconds using on-chain data, compliance databases, and behavioral signals. Manual review requires analysts to gather data, apply judgment, and document findings -- all sequentially.

Consistency at scale

Every SKOOR assessment applies the same 10-factor model with the same weights. Manual review varies by analyst experience, attention, and the time of day. Inconsistency introduces risk.

Continuous monitoring replaces snapshots

Manual reviews are point-in-time. By the time the report is filed, the data may be stale. SKOOR re-scores every 5 minutes, catching changes before they become incidents.

Switch to automated scoring

Free tier available. Score your first entity in under 2 minutes.