SKOOR Risk Money movement. Skoored by AI.

Alert · reviewed · open

Activity on an entity flagged by screening (PEP status no, high risk).

Detector
sanctions_or_pep
Severity
high
Program
Meridian Remit (simulated)
Subject
entity enti_sim_meri_5if3mzfr9pn
Transfer
acht_sim_meri_75gruliga5p · $534.26 · ach outgoing
Skoor at alert
30 review
Hard signal
no
Policy
policy-v1
Opened
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Closed
Decision clock
none · due — no clock
Escalated

Draft narrative

What happened. An alert fired because entity enti_sim_meri_5if3mzfr9pn, a US-based business named "High Risk Trading 2," was flagged by screening as high risk. The alert is tied to one ACH outgoing credit transfer of $534.26 (acht_sim_meri_75gruliga5p), settled, to a first-time counterparty whose country is unknown. What the evidence shows. The entity is VERIFIED, marked pep: no, and lists no specific review reasons. Last screened 2026-06-26, which is within the program's normal cadence (stale_screening_share is 0.033, flagged 'ok'). The alert score is 30, banded 'review,' with hard_signal false, driven only by the generic entity.high_risk signal (+20) plus a transfer-level counterparty.first_time signal (+10). There is no sanctions list match detail, no adverse-media or PEP finding, and no return code or dispute on the transfer, which is already SETTLED. Program KRIs show high_risk_entity_share at 3.3% (ok) and pep_flagged_entities at watch (1 of 30, small sample). No prior dispositions exist for this entity or alert. What was checked. Reviewed the alert evidence payload, the entity's screening fields (verification, pep, high_risk, review reasons, last screened date), the transfer's status and counterparty details, the program's declared volume and rails, and the program KRI panel for corroborating patterns (frozen accounts, verification denial rate, stale screening share, sanctioned country transfers). What is recommended. Close the alert. The entity carries a high-risk category label from screening but has no specific sanctions or PEP match, is verified, has no open review reasons, and was screened within a normal window. The associated transfer has already settled with no return or dispute. Nothing in the evidence requires further transaction hold or escalation. If the counterparty's unknown country or the first-time relationship becomes a repeated pattern, a person should revisit at that time.
Recommendation
close
Confidence
0.68
Model
claude-sonnet-5
Drafted
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Rationale
  • Entity status is VERIFIED with pep: no and review reasons: none.
  • Score of 30 sits in the 'review' band with hard_signal false; only a generic high_risk category signal and a first-time-counterparty signal are present, not a specific sanctions/PEP hit.
  • Last screening date (2026-06-26) falls within the program's normal cadence per stale_screening_share (0.033, ok).
  • Transfer acht_sim_meri_75gruliga5p is already SETTLED with no return code, so there is no pending movement to hold or release.
  • Program KRIs (high_risk_entity_share, verification_denial_rate) are in 'ok' status; pep_flagged_entities is 'watch' but based on a small sample (n=30) and not specific to this entity.
  • No prior dispositions exist, so there is no established pattern of repeat alerts on this entity to justify escalation.

Evidence

{
  "n": 122,
  "band": "review",
  "skoor": 30,
  "signals": [
    {
      "code": "entity.high_risk",
      "detail": "entity marked high risk by screening",
      "weight": 20
    }
  ],
  "routeReason": "detector always reviewed"
}

Skoor signals

SignalWeightHardDetail
entity.high_risk+20entity marked high risk by screening
counterparty.first_time+10first transfer with this counterparty

Decision

Sign in as an operator to decide. Operator sign-in →

Dispositions

No disposition yet.

Actions

Freeze, request to program, and suspend need a second, distinct approver. Clear hold, cancel, and pause execute on the requester's approval. Executed through the bank's own API with the tenant's sandbox key; a dry run when there is none.

No actions requested.