SKOOR Risk Money movement. Skoored by AI.

Alert · reviewed · open

Activity on an entity flagged by screening (PEP status potential).

Detector
sanctions_or_pep
Severity
high
Program
Northwind Payroll (simulated)
Subject
entity enti_sim_nort_sr7cv2o3u
Transfer
acht_sim_nort_1qtqw7awqr · $2,139.27 · ach outgoing
Skoor at alert
25 clear
Hard signal
no
Policy
policy-v1
Opened
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Closed
Decision clock
none · due — no clock
Escalated

Draft narrative

What happened. A sanctions/PEP detector flagged entity enti_sim_nort_sr7cv2o3u for a potential PEP match, triggered by activity on ACH outgoing debit acht_sim_nort_1qtqw7awqr for $2139.27 USD under the Northwind Payroll program. The alert routed to review because the detector always routes to review, not because of score severity. What the evidence shows. The alert-level skoor is 25, banded clear, with hard_signal false. The only contributing signal is entity.pep_potential (+15). The transfer itself also scored 25, clear band, with signals entity.pep_potential(+15) and counterparty.first_time(+10); it settled with no return code. The entity record shows verification VERIFIED, high_risk false, review reasons none, and a screening date of 2026-06-25, about three months before the transfer. Country is US. The entity name "Potential Pep 0" and simulated identifiers indicate this is test data. What was checked. Alert evidence, linked transfer detail, entity screening record, and program KRIs. Program KRIs show pep_flagged_entities at 1 of 33 (watch) and high_risk_entity_share at 0.06 (watch), both within a single-digit count that does not indicate a program-wide pattern. manual_review_aging_hours shows a breach but is based on n=1, an unmeasured-scale sample, so it cannot be tied to this alert. No sanctioned_country_transfers, no ach_unauthorized_return_rate, and reserve_coverage_ratio is well above 1. No prior dispositions exist for this alert. What is recommended. Close the alert. The entity is verified with no open review reasons, the PEP match is marked potential (unconfirmed) rather than confirmed, the transfer settled cleanly with no return, and the alert score sits in the clear band with no hard signal. The transfer was not placed on hold, so no release action applies. A person should confirm the PEP screening outcome at the next periodic review given the entity remains flagged as pep_potential in the underlying record.
Recommendation
close
Confidence
0.68
Model
claude-sonnet-5
Drafted
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Rationale
  • skoor 25 in clear band, hard_signal false, single contributing signal (entity.pep_potential)
  • entity verification status is VERIFIED with review reasons none and a recent screening date
  • transfer acht_sim_nort_1qtqw7awqr settled with return code none, no funds currently held so release is not applicable
  • program KRIs show pep_flagged_entities and high_risk_entity_share at watch level but with small counts (1 and ~2 of 33), not indicating a broader pattern
  • manual_review_aging_hours breach is based on n=1 and cannot be attributed to this specific alert
  • no prior dispositions exist to inform escalation history

Evidence

{
  "n": 200,
  "band": "clear",
  "skoor": 25,
  "signals": [
    {
      "code": "entity.pep_potential",
      "detail": "potential PEP match",
      "weight": 15
    }
  ],
  "routeReason": "detector always reviewed"
}

Skoor signals

SignalWeightHardDetail
entity.pep_potential+15potential PEP match
counterparty.first_time+10first transfer with this counterparty

Decision

Sign in as an operator to decide. Operator sign-in →

Dispositions

No disposition yet.

Actions

Freeze, request to program, and suspend need a second, distinct approver. Clear hold, cancel, and pause execute on the requester's approval. Executed through the bank's own API with the tenant's sandbox key; a dry run when there is none.

No actions requested.