Activity on an entity flagged by screening (PEP status potential).

What happened. An alert fired on entity enti_sim_lant_866sn4vcjd, a person named "Potential Pep 3", due to a potential PEP screening match. The alert is tied to one settled outgoing ACH credit transfer of $998.11 dated 2026-09-08. What the evidence shows. The alert score is 15, banded clear, driven by a single signal entity.pep_potential (+15). Hard signal is false. The entity is VERIFIED, high_risk is false, review reasons are none, and last screened 2026-09-01. The transfer itself carries the same skoor of 15, band clear, with no other risk signals, and it settled with no return code. Program-level KRIs show pep_flagged_entities at 1 of 33 (watch, but consistent with a single flagged entity), high_risk_entity_share and verification_denial_rate both low (0.03), stale_screening_share at 0, and ach return rates near zero. Two KRIs are outside normal range: hold_aging_hours (watch) and manual_review_aging_hours (breach), but neither is specific to this entity or transfer and no prior dispositions exist to suggest a pattern. What was checked. Alert evidence and score, transfer status and return code, entity verification and risk flags, screening recency, program KRIs for PEP and screening health, and prior disposition history for this entity. What is recommended. Close the alert. The PEP match is potential only, the entity is verified with no high-risk flag and no review reasons, screening is current (2026-09-01), the transfer settled cleanly with no return, and the score bands clear with no hard signal. The manual_review_aging_hours breach is a program-level metric unrelated to this specific entity or transfer and does not present evidence requiring a hold on these funds. A person should note the aging breach separately if it recurs across other alerts.

{
  "n": 715,
  "band": "clear",
  "skoor": 15,
  "signals": [
    {
      "code": "entity.pep_potential",
      "detail": "potential PEP match",
      "weight": 15
    }
  ],
  "routeReason": "detector always reviewed"
}