SKOOR Risk Money movement. Skoored by AI.

Alert · reviewed · open

Activity on an entity flagged by screening (PEP status potential).

Detector
sanctions_or_pep
Severity
high
Program
Lantern Lending (simulated)
Subject
entity enti_sim_lant_866sn4vcjd
Transfer
acht_sim_lant_4mudrrmycnx · $1,402.45 · ach outgoing
Skoor at alert
15 clear
Hard signal
no
Policy
policy-v1
Opened
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Closed
Decision clock
none · due — no clock
Escalated

Draft narrative

What happened. The system flagged entity enti_sim_lant_866sn4vcjd for a potential PEP match under the sanctions_or_pep detector. The alert attaches to a single settled ACH outgoing credit transfer, acht_sim_lant_4mudrrmycnx, for $1,402.45 USD, dated 2026-07-14, with no return code. What the evidence shows. The entity screening record shows verification status VERIFIED, high_risk false, and review_reasons none, with a last screening date of 2026-06-25. The only signal driving this alert is entity.pep_potential with a weight of 15, producing a skoor of 15 in the 'clear' band with hard_signal false and a stated confidence of 0.3025 on n=35. The route reason is 'detector always reviewed,' meaning this alert was queued for review regardless of score. The transfer itself is settled, has no return code, and the counterparty country is unknown, but no signal ties the transaction amount or counterparty to elevated risk beyond the entity-level PEP potential flag. What was checked. Reviewed the entity record (verification, risk flag, review reasons, screening date), the transfer record (status, amount, rail, return code, counterparty), the program declared volume and rails, the skoor breakdown and confidence value, and prior dispositions. No prior dispositions exist for this entity or transfer. What is recommended. The transfer is already settled, so no hold or release action applies to it. Given the clear-band skoor, no hard signal, a verified entity with no review reasons, and a low stated confidence (0.3025) behind the single PEP-potential signal, the evidence does not show a pattern or unresolved risk indicator requiring further action. Recommend closing the alert. A person should confirm this reading given the PEP designation is inherently sensitive and the evidence base (n=35) is thin.
Recommendation
close
Confidence
0.62
Model
claude-sonnet-5
Drafted
2026-09-17 19:30Z
Rationale
  • Entity is VERIFIED with high_risk false and review_reasons none as of last screening 2026-06-25.
  • Skoor is 15, band clear, hard_signal false; the only contributing signal is entity.pep_potential (+15).
  • Stated confidence behind the skoor is low (0.3025) on n=35, indicating thin supporting data for the score itself.
  • Transfer acht_sim_lant_4mudrrmycnx is already SETTLED with no return code, so hold/release actions do not apply.
  • Route reason is 'detector always reviewed,' meaning routing to review does not itself indicate elevated risk.
  • No prior dispositions exist to suggest a recurring or escalating pattern for this entity.

Evidence

{
  "n": 35,
  "band": "clear",
  "skoor": 15,
  "signals": [
    {
      "code": "entity.pep_potential",
      "detail": "potential PEP match",
      "weight": 15
    }
  ],
  "routeReason": "detector always reviewed"
}

Skoor signals

SignalWeightHardDetail
entity.pep_potential+15potential PEP match

Decision

Sign in as an operator to decide. Operator sign-in →

Dispositions

No disposition yet.

Actions

Freeze, request to program, and suspend need a second, distinct approver. Clear hold, cancel, and pause execute on the requester's approval. Executed through the bank's own API with the tenant's sandbox key; a dry run when there is none.

No actions requested.